Eye morphometry, body size, and flexibility parameters in myopic adolescents.

The aim of this study was to investigate the anatomical and physiological ocular parameters in adolescents with myopia and to examine the relations between refractive error (SER), ocular biometry, body size and flexibility parameters in myopic adolescents. A cross-sectional study of 184 myopic adolescents, aged 15 to 19 years was conducted. Refractive error and corneal curvature measures of the eye were evaluated using an autorefractometer under cycloplegia. Central corneal thickness was determined by contact pachymetry. The ocular axial length, anterior and vitreous chamber depth, and lens thickness were measured using A-scan biometry ultrasonography. Height and body weight were measured according to a standardized protocol. Body mass index (BMI) was subsequently calculated. Beighton scale was used to measure joint flexibility. Body stature was positively correlated with ocular axial length (r = 0.39, p < 0.001) and vitreous chamber depth (r = 0.37, p < 0.001). There was a negative correlation between height and SER (r = - 0.46; p < 0.001). Beighton score and body weight had weak positive correlations with axial length and vitreous chamber depth, and a weak negative correlation with SER. A significantly more negative SER was observed in the increased joint mobility group (p < 0.05; U = 5065.5) as compared to normal joint mobility group: mean - 4.37 ± 1.85 D (median - 4.25; IQR - 6.25 to - 3.25 D) and mean - 3.72 ± 1.66 D (median - 3.50; IQR - 4.75 to - 2.25 D) respectively. There was a strong association between height and axial length, as well as SER. Higher degree of myopia significantly correlated with greater Beighton score (increased joint mobility).

Impact of segmented optical axial length on the performance of intraocular lens power calculation formulas.

PURPOSE: To investigate the difference between the segmented axial length (AL) and the composite AL on a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and to evaluate the subsequent effects on artificial intelligence intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations: the Kane and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas compared with established vergence formulas. SETTING: National Hospital Organization, Tokyo Medical Center, Japan. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery with a single-piece IOL were reviewed. The prediction accuracy of the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hill-RBF 3.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, and SRK/T formulas based on 2 ALs were compared for each formula. The heteroscedastic test was used with the SD of prediction errors as the endpoint for formula performance. RESULTS: The study included 145 eyes of 145 patients. The segmented AL (24.83 ± 1.89) was significantly shorter than the composite AL (24.88 ± 1.96, P < .001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a negative proportional bias for the differences between the segmented AL and the composite AL. The SD values obtained by Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas based on the segmented AL (0.52 diopters [D], 0.54 D, and 0.50 D, respectively) were significantly lower than those based on the composite AL (0.57 D, 0.60 D, and 0.52 D, respectively, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The segmented ALs were longer in short eyes and shorter in long eyes than the composite ALs. The refractive accuracy can be improved in the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas by changing the composite ALs to the segmented ALs.

Guided Trocar Insertion in Highly Myopic Eyes.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate through a diagnostic test used as a new preoperative assessment that trocar insertion for pars plana vitrectomy could be safely placed at a distance >4.0 mm in highly myopic eyes to facilitate the surgical maneuvers. METHODS: Thirty eyes of 30 patients were tested with a biometer for the axial length measurement and with ultrasound biomicroscopy to measure the pars plana length. Pars plana lengths of highly myopic eyes were then compared with those of emmetropic eyes. The surgeon also measured the pars plana of highly myopic eyes intraoperatively and compared it with ultrasound measurements to assess ultrasound biomicroscopy reliability. RESULTS: The mean axial length was 23.81 mm (SD ± 0.30) in the control group and 31.11 mm (SD ± 0.56) in the myopic group. The mean pars plana length was 4.96 mm (SD ± 0.19) in control eyes and 6.65 (SD ± 0.36) in myopic eyes. An extremely significant statistical difference ( P < 0.001) was obtained by comparing the length of pars plana between control eyes and myopic eyes. The results of pars plana measurements were 6.65 mm (SD ± 0.36, ultrasound biomicroscopy) and 6.66 mm (SD ± 0.34, intraoperative measurements) in myopic eyes. The statistical comparison of the measurements in these two groups did not give a statistically significant result ( P = 0.950). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound biomicroscopy is a reliable technique to calculate the length of pars plana in highly myopic eyes, where this parameter is significantly greater than that of emmetropic eyes. Trocars insertion for pars plana vitrectomy may be performed, in eyes with axial length >30 mm, in relative safety at a distance to limbus higher than 4 mm.

Comparison of the ocular ultrasonic and optical biometry devices in the different quality measurements.

PURPOSE: To compare the reliability and agreement of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT) measurements obtained with optical biometry based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (IOLMaster 700; Carl Zeiss, Germany) and an ultrasound biometry device (Nidek; US-4000 Echoscan, Japan) in different qualities of AL measurement. METHODS: A total of 239 consecutive eyes of 239 cataract surgery candidates with a mean age of 56 ± 14 years were included. The quality measurements were grouped according to the quartiles of SD of the measured AL by IOLMaster 700. The first and fourth quartile's SD are defined as high and low-quality measurement, respectively, and the second and third quartiles' SD is defined as moderate-quality. RESULTS: The reliability of AL and ACD between the two devices in all patients and in different quality measurement groups was excellent with highly statistically significant (AL: all ICC=0.999 and P<0.001, ACD: all ICC>0.920 and P<0.001). AL and ACD in all quality measurements showed a very strong correlation between devices with highly statistically significant. However, there was poor (ICC=0.305), moderate (ICC=0.742), and good (ICC=0.843) reliability in measuring LT in low-, moderate-, and high-quality measurements, respectively. LT showed a very strong correlation (r = 0.854) with highly statistically significant (P<0.001) between devices only in patients with high-quality measurements. CONCLUSIONS: AL and ACD of the IOLMaster700 had outstanding agreements with the US-4000 ultrasound in different quality measurements of AL and can be used interchangeably. But LT should be used interchangeably cautiously only in the high-quality measurements group.

Retrospective Comparison of the Myopia Master and the Lenstar LS900 Axial Length Measurements in Children with Myopia.

BACKGROUND: This study is a retrospective analysis to compare ocular biometry measurements of axial length in children with myopia using Myopia Master (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) and Lenstar LS900 (HAAG-STREIT AG, Köniz, Switzerland). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Axial length measurements obtained with both instruments within a 3-week period were collected retrospectively. Measurements were visualized with a Bland-Altman plot. For statistical evaluation, a paired t-test was applied, and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was established. RESULTS: Sixty-one eyes from 31 myopic patients (59% male, 41% female) with a mean age of 11.34 ± 3.25 years (range: 6 - 18 years) were identified. Mean axial length was 24.7 mm (SD 1.29) with the Myopia Master and 24.69 mm (SD 1.30) with the Lenstar LS900 (Pearson correlation: r = 0.9991). The average difference of the axial length measurement between the two biometers was 0.00 064 mm ± 0.056 SD (p = 0.9293). CONCLUSION: The axial length measured by Myopia Master and Lenstar LS900 did not differ significantly. Thus, previous values obtained with the Lenstar LS900 can be applied to assess myopia progression.

Deep Learning-based Prediction of Axial Length Using Ultra-widefield Fundus Photography.

PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model that can predict the axial lengths of eyes using ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus photography. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled patients who visited the ophthalmology clinic at the Seoul National University Hospital between September 2018 and December 2021. Patients with axial length measurements and UWF images taken within 3 months of axial length measurement were included in the study. The dataset was divided into a development set and a test set at an 8:2 ratio while maintaining an equal distribution of axial lengths (stratified splitting with binning). We used transfer learning-based on EfficientNet B3 to develop the model. We evaluated the model's performance using mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R2), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used vanilla gradient saliency maps to illustrate the regions predominantly used by convolutional neural network. RESULTS: In total, 8,657 UWF retinal fundus images from 3,829 patients (mean age, 63.98 ±15.25 years) were included in the study. The deep learning model predicted the axial lengths of the test dataset with MAE and R2 values of 0.744 mm (95% CI, 0.709-0.779 mm) and 0.815 (95% CI, 0.785-0.840), respectively. The model's accuracy was 73.7%, 95.9%, and 99.2% in prediction, with error margins of ±1.0, ±2.0, and ±3.0 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a deep learning-based model for predicting the axial length from UWF images with good performance.

Comparison of the accuracy of nine intraocular lens power calculation formulas using partial coherence interferometry.

Cataract surgery is the most performed procedure in the world. To achieve the target refraction, several intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas have been developed to improve the accuracy of IOL power predictions. We compared the accuracy of 9 IOL power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, Kane, EVO 2.0, Ladas Super formula and Hill-RBF 3.0) using partial coherence interferometry (PCI). We collected data from patients who underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery with implantation of 1 of 3 IOL types currently used in our center. All preoperative biometric measurements were performed using PCI. Prediction errors (PE) were deduced from refractive outcomes evaluated 3 months after surgery. The mean prediction error (ME), mean absolute prediction error (MAE), median absolute prediction error (MedAE), and standard deviation of prediction error (SD) were calculated, as well as the percentage of eyes with a PE within ± 0.25, ± 0.50, ± 0.75 and ± 1.00D for each formula. We included 126 eyes of 126 patients. Kane achieved the lowest MAE and SD across the entire sample as well as the highest percentage of PE within ± 0.50D and was shown to be more accurate than Haigis and Hoffer Q (P<001). For an axial length of more than 26.0mm, EVO 2.0 and Barrett obtained the lowest MAEs, with EVO 2.0 and Kane showing a higher percentage of prediction at ±0.50D compared to old generation formulas except for SRK/T (P=04). All investigated formulas achieved good results; there was a tendency toward better outcomes with new generation formulas, especially in atypical eyes.

Repeatability and agreement of swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry biometers in myopes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Biometric measurements in the context of myopia are fundamental to detect eyes at risk of developing myopia and during the follow-up of patients with myopia control treatment. Thus, the accuracy of biometers has high clinical relevance. BACKGROUND: The Myopia Master is a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry especially dedicated to the follow-up of myopic patients. This study aims to assess the repeatability of the Myopia Master and evaluate its agreement with a swept-source optical coherence interferometry biometer (IOL Master 700). METHODS: This cross-sectional prospective study assessed the biometric parameters of two groups of myopes (age range: 8-16 years old), spectacle corrected (n = 60) and orthokeratology contact lens wearers (n = 60). One senior optometrist performed two consecutive measurements per instrument, which included axial length, mean keratometry and horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID). The repeatability of each device and the agreement between devices were assessed by the dispersion of the measurement differences, for AL, mean keratometry, corneal astigmatism and HVID. RESULTS: The two biometers measured approximately the same value in both measurements. Test-retest repeatability tended to be lower than clinical significant thresholds, in particular, for AL and mean keratometry. Corneal-related parameters tended to have lower repeatability in the orthokeratology group, especially mean keratometry. The agreement between instruments revealed statistically significant differences between devices with the SS-OCT measuring longer eyes, steeper corneas and larger HVID. CONCLUSIONS: In a paediatric population, the Myopia Master showed clinically acceptable repeatability levels, but the IOL Master 700 demonstrated superior repeatability. Eyes treated with orthokeratology may compromise the repeatability of the corneal-related parameters. The Myopia Master and the IOL Master 700 are repeatable devices appropriate for monitoring myopia progression, but the differences observed do not allow their use interchangeably.

Repeatability and comparability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer in optical biometry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility in the measurement of ocular biometric parameters using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and its comparability with an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer. DESIGN: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. METHODS: 45 right eyes of 45 patients diagnosed with cataract were included. Three successive biometric measurements with Anterion and one with Lenstar LS900 were performed on each patient. The following variables were collected: axial length (AXL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), flat K (K1), steep K (K2), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT) and white-to-white distance (WTW). The intrasubject standard deviation (Sw) and the coefficient of Pearson "R" were calculated in order to assess the repeatability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were obtained to evaluate the comparability between devices. A Bland-Altman plot was performed for each variable. RESULTS: The coefficient of Pearson was excellent and statistically significant in the evaluation of the repeatability in all the variables. The highest values were 0.987 (AXL), 0.983 (CCT) and 0.942 (ACD). There were no statically significant differences between repeated measurements with Anterion in all the parameters. The ICC and CCC were excellent in the evaluation of AXL, CCT and ACD, and were also good in regard to K1, K2, LT and WTW. CONCLUSIONS: Performing biometry with the SS-OCT Anterion is a reliable and reproducible procedure, and it is comparable with the Lenstar LS900.

Update on Biometry and Lens Calculation - A Review of the Basic Principles and New Developments. / Update Biometrie und Linsenberechnung ­ ein Review zu Grundlagen und neuen Entwicklungen.

These days, accurate calculation of artificial lenses is an important aspect of patient management. In addition to the classic theoretical optical formulae there are a number of new approaches, most of which are available as online calculators. This review aims to explain the background of artificial lens calculation and provide an update on study results based on the latest calculation approaches. Today, optical biometry provides the computational basis for theoretical optical formulae, ray tracing, and also empirical approaches using artificial intelligence. Manufacturer information on IOL design and IOL power recorded as part of quality control could improve calculations, especially for higher IOL powers. With modern measurement data, there is further potential for improvement in the determination of the axial length to the retinal pigment epithelium and by adopting a sum-of-segment approach. With the available data, the cornea can be assumed to be a thick lens. The Kane formula, the EVO 2.0 formula, the Castrop formula, the PEARL-DGS, formula and the OKULIX calculation software provide consistently good results for artificial lens calculations. Excellent refractive results can be achieved using these tools, with approximately 80% having an absolute prediction error within 0.50 dpt, at least in highly selected study populations. The Barrett Universal II formula also produces excellent results in the normal and long axial length range. For eyes with short axial lengths, the use of Barrett Universal II should be reconsidered; in this case, one of the methods mentioned above is preferable. Second Eye Refinement can also be considered in this patient population, in conjunction with established classic third generation formulae.

[Alternative method of intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length]. / Al'ternativnyi sposob rascheta opticheskoi sily intraokulyarnykh linz pri korotkoi perednezadnei osi glaza.

PURPOSE: To develop an alternative method of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes with mature cataract and axial length (AL) of less than 22.0 mm using modern formulas Barrett Universal II and Hill RBF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study enrolled 41 patients (41 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification (PE). Ultrasound biometry (Tomey Biometer Al-100) and keratometry (Topcon-8800) were used for IOL power calculation by SRK/T and Haigis formulas. To calculate IOL power by Barrett Universal II and Hill RBF formulas, 0.2 mm were added to AL measured with ultrasonography (retinal thickness). One month after PE, spherical equivalent of refraction was compared with target refraction (calculated by the formulas listed above), and based on that a conclusion was made on the accuracy of calculations. RESULTS: Haigis formula was found to be the least accurate (IOL calculation error -0.39±0.79 D). The calculation error in SRK/T (0.04±0.79 D), Barrett Universal II (0.02±0.79 D) and Hill RBF (-0.05±0.73 D) formulas was much lower. However, among them Hill RBF had the lowest spread of the mean absolute IOL calculation error. Pairwise comparison revealed significant difference of mean IOL calculation error by Haigis formula versus the others. There was no significant difference in the following pairs: SRK/T - Barrett Universal II (p=0.855), and SRK/T - Hill RBF (p=0.167), but there was a significant difference (p=0.043) in the Barrett Universal II - Hill RBF pairdue to the tendency for slight hypermetropic calculation error in the former and the inherent slight myopic shift in the latter.. CONCLUSION: The proposed alternative method of IOL power calculation in eyes with mature cataract and short AL using modern formulas (Barrett Universal II and Hill RBF) shows higher accuracy compared to the formulas embedded in ultrasound biometer (SRK/T and Haigis), and can be recommended for use in everyday practice.

Evaluation of ocular biometry in primary angle-closure disease with two swept source optical coherence tomography devices.

PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between 2 swept source OCT biometers, IOL Master700 and Anterion, in various ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculations of primary angle-closure disease (PACD). SETTING: Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. DESIGN: Prospective comparative study. METHODS: This study conducted in a tertiary eye care center involving biometric measurements obtained with 2 devices in phakic eye with diagnosis of PACD. Mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with confidence limits were assessed, and calculations of estimated residual refraction of the IOL were analysed using Barrett's formula. RESULTS: Sixty-nine eyes from 45 PACD patients were enrolled for the study. Excellent agreement of various parameters was revealed, with ICC (confidence limits) of K1 = 0.953 (0.861-0.979), K2 = 0.950 (0.778-0.98), ACD = 0.932 (0.529-0.978), WTW = 0.775 (0.477-0.888), and LT = 0.947 (0.905-0.97). Mean difference of axial length (AL) was -0.01 ± 0.02 mm with ICC of 1.000. IOL calculation was assessed with Barrett's formula, and Bland-Altman plot showed excellent agreement in the results of the 2 devices for the IOL power and estimated post-operative residual refraction (EPR). CONCLUSIONS: Mean differences of biometric parameters, obtained with IOL Master700 and Anterion, were small, and ICC showed excellent concordance. No clinical relevance in calculation of IOL power was found, and the two devices appeared to be comparably effective in clinical practice.

Measuring axial length of the eye from magnetic resonance brain imaging.

BACKGROUND: Metrics derived from the human eye are increasingly used as biomarkers and endpoints in studies of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and neurological disease. In this context, it is important to account for potential confounding that can arise from differences in ocular dimensions between individuals, for example, differences in globe size. METHODS: We measured axial length, a geometric parameter describing eye size from T2-weighted brain MRI scans using three different image analysis software packages (Mango, ITK and Carestream) and compared results to biometry measurements from a specialized ophthalmic instrument (IOLMaster 500) as the reference standard. RESULTS: Ninety-three healthy research participants of mean age 51.0 ± SD 5.4 years were analyzed. The level of agreement between the MRI-derived measurements and the reference standard was described by mean differences as follows, Mango - 0.8 mm; ITK - 0.5 mm; and Carestream - 0.1 mm (upper/lower 95% limits of agreement across the three tools ranged from 0.9 mm to - 2.6 mm). Inter-rater reproducibility was between - 0.03 mm and 0.45 mm (ICC 0.65 to 0.93). Intra-rater repeatability was between 0.0 mm and - 0.2 mm (ICC 0.90 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that axial measurements of the eye derived from brain MRI are within 3.5% of the reference standard globe length of 24.1 mm. However, the limits of agreement could be considered clinically significant. Axial length of the eye obtained from MRI is not a replacement for the precision of biometry, but in the absence of biometry it could provide sufficient accuracy to act as a proxy. We recommend measuring eye axial length from MRI in studies that do not have biometry but use retinal imaging to study neurodegenerative changes so as to control for differing eye size across individuals.

Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer in Japanese patients with EYS-related retinitis pigmentosa: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify the features of ocular biometry in patients with EYS-related retinitis pigmentosa using IOLMaster 700. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Patients with records of the following were included: (1) ocular biometry measurements using the IOLMaster 700 and (2) genetic diagnostic tests. Axial length, keratometry, anterior chamber depth, aqueous depth, lens thickness, central corneal thickness (CCT), and corneal diameter (white to white) measurements were extracted. Based on keratometry measurements, (1) standard keratometric astigmatism, (2) posterior corneal astigmatism, and (3) total corneal astigmatism were obtained. Demographics and biometric parameters were compared between patients with EYS-related retinitis pigmentosa and other patients with retinitis pigmentosa. RESULTS: A total of 86 eyes of 44 patients (23 females and 21 males; mean age: 47.7 years) with retinitis pigmentosa were included. Of these, 18 were identified as having EYS variants. CCT was significantly thinner (P < 0.001) and the posterior corneal curvature at the steepest meridian was significantly smaller (P = 0.024) in patients with EYS-related retinitis pigmentosa than in other patients with retinitis pigmentosa. The magnitudes of all corneal astigmatism measurements was higher in patients with EYS-related RP, although these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Patients with EYS-related retinitis pigmentosa had unique features in ocular biometry, such as thinner central corneal thickness and smaller posterior corneal curvature radius at the steepest meridian compared with other patients with retinitis pigmentosa. The findings suggest that patients with retinitis pigmentosa have different ocular dimension features among the different causative genes.

Intraocular Pressure and Its Relation to Ocular Geometry: Results From the Gutenberg Health Study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular geometry. Methods: The Gutenberg Health Study is a population-based cohort study in Mainz, Germany. Study participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination including noncontact tonometry, objective refraction, optical biometry, and Scheimpflug imaging of the anterior segment at the first 5-year follow-up examination (in 2012-2017). Multivariable linear regression analysis was carried out to determine associations of IOP and geometric parameter of the human phakic eye, namely central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness, and axial length. In addition, the relationship of IOP and the anterior chamber angle (ACA) width was analyzed. Results: There were 6640 participants with phakia (age 57.3 ± 10.2 years, 49.1% women) that were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Mean IOP was 14.8 ± 2.9 mm Hg in the right eyes and 14.9 ± 2.9 mm Hg in the left eyes. IOP increased with higher CCT, greater posterior segment length, higher age (all P < 0.001), thicker lens (P = 0.003), and female sex (P = 0.05), whereas the ACD was not associated with higher IOP. The IOP increased with a narrower ACA in univariable analysis (P < 0.001), but not in adjusted analysis in subjects with an open angle. Conclusions: IOP values are related to ocular geometry, as shown in this population-based study on Caucasian subjects. Thus, knowledge of the architecture of the eye is an important factor when measuring IOP. Longitudinal evaluation will analyze whether some of these parameters are also risk factors for the development of glaucoma.

Ocular biometry in dense cataracts: Comparison of partial-coherence interferometry, swept-source optical coherence tomography and immersion ultrasound.

PURPOSE: To assess the axial length (AL) measurement failure rate using partial-coherence interferometry (PCI) and swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in dense cataracts. As a secondary outcome, the SS-OCT biometry was compared to immersion ultrasound. METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional and comparative study. Seventy eyes from 70 patients with dense cataracts were enrolled in this study. Dense cataract was defined according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III) scores equal to or more than NO4, NC4, C4, and P3. The failure rate of AL measurement was evaluated using PCI and SS-OCT. Anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and AL measurements obtained by SS-OCT were compared with IUS. RESULTS: AL measurement failure rate with PCI was 68.57% and 21.43% with SS-OCT (P = 0.007). AL measurement was achieved in 69.23% of NO4, 66.6% of P3, and 15.3% of mixed cataracts using PCI, while SS-OCT was achieved in 100% of NO4, NO5, P3, and P5 and 76.9% of mixed cataracts. Cortical cataracts alone did not influence AL measurement. Biometric data of ACD, LT, and AL were statistically different comparing US and SS-OCT with a good correlation of AL. CONCLUSION: SS-OCT significantly improves the rate of successful AL measurements when compared to PCI in dense cataracts. The LOCS III clinical cut-off for the use of SS-OCT ocular biometry may well be up to P4 and NO5.

Histopathology of myopic cobblestones.

PURPOSE: To search for the histological correlate of peripheral 'cobblestones' in highly myopic eyes. METHODS: The histomorphometric investigation included histologic sections of enucleated eyes of Caucasian patients. Using light microscopy, we measured the thickness of the retina, Bruch's membrane (BM) and choriocapillaris. RESULTS: The study included 50 eyes (mean age:60.6 ± 18.7 years;axial length:26.5 ± 3.8 mm), with cobblestone regions detected in 7 eyes. BM thickness and choriocapillaris thickness in the cobblestone region were thinner (1.1 ± 0.2 µm versus 2.4 ± 0.8 µm; p < 0.001 and 1.6 ± 0.5 µm versus 2.6 ± 1.9 µm; p = 0.02, respectively), and just outside of the cobblestone region they were thicker (3.3 ± 0.6 µm versus 2.4 ± 0.8 µm; p = 0.005 and 5.7 ± 1.6 µm versus 2.6 ± 1.9 µm; p = 0.002, respectively) than in corresponding regions of eyes without cobblestones. Within the group of eyes with cobblestones, BM thickness (1.1 ± 0.2 mm versus 3.3 ± 0.6 mm; p < 0.001), choriocapillaris thickness (1.6 ± 0.5 mm versus 5.7 ± 1.6 mm; p < 0.001) and choriocapillaris density (48±15 µm/300 µm versus 159 ± 66 µm/300 µm;PP=0.002) were significantly lower in the cobblestone region than just outside of the cobblestone region. The cobblestone regions were characterized by firm adhesion of disorganized retina with thinned BM, few retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) islands within cobblestone regions, and absence of regional scleral or overall choroidal thinning. BM was mono-layered within, and double-layered outside of cobblestone regions, with the inner layer missing within the cobblestone region (except for the RPE islands). CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral cobblestone regions in highly myopic eyes are characterized by marked BM thinning with absence of an inner BM layer, almost complete RPE absence, choriocapillaris thinning and firm connection of a disorganized retina to BM. These findings may help elucidating the process of axial elongation in myopic eyes.

Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology.

PURPOSE: In the event that any ocular parameter involved in the calculation of intraocular lens power could not be properly measured in one eye, it is important to know whether clinically relevant differences between both eyes can be expected. The aim of this work is to evaluate the symmetry of interocular biometric parameters. METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study involving 4090 subjects. Patients underwent consecutive swept-source optical biometry performed with an IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The biometric parameters that were evaluated were: axial length (AL), mean anterior curvature (Rm), anterior chamber depth (ACD), crystalline lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT) and white-to-white (WTW). The Chang-Waring chord distance (CWC-D) and the Chang-Waring chord angle (CWC-A) were also evaluated. RESULTS: There is an excellent correlation between both eyes for almost all the biometric parameters under study, with the exception of the CWC. Agreement for AL was better for eyes shorter than 24 mm. The linearity of the OD-vs-OS relationship can be correctly assumed for all parameters (Cusum test: p > 0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: There are no clinically significant interocular differences for the biometric parameters under study, although for all of them, except the LT, statistically significant differences did arise. In the case of AL, moderate differences can be expected in eyes larger than 24 mm.

Retinal OFF-Pathway Overstimulation Leads to Greater Accommodation-Induced Choroidal Thinning.

Purpose: To examine the interactions between accommodation and overstimulation of the retinal ON- and OFF-pathways, and their association with changes in choroidal thickness (ChT) and vascularity. Methods: Optical coherence tomography imaging of the choroid of twenty young adults (ages 25 ± 5 years) was performed before and after a series of 30-minute-long viewing tasks, including reading a bright text on dark background (ON-pathway overstimulation) and dark text on bright background (OFF-pathway overstimulation), and a control task of viewing a movie with unbiased ON-/OFF-pathway activation. The viewing tasks were performed with relaxed, and 5 diopter (D) accommodation (induced by soft contact lenses) demands. Both reading texts were matched for the mean luminance (35 cd/m2), luminance contrast (87%), and letter size (approximately 11.8 arc minutes). The change in ChT from baseline associated with contrast polarity and accommodation was examined using linear mixed model analysis. Results: The subfoveal ChT decreased significantly by -7 ± 1 µm with 5 D accommodation compared with relaxed accommodation (-3 ± 1 µm; P < 0.001), and by -9 ± 1 µm with OFF-pathway compared with ON-pathway overstimulation (-4 ± 1 µm; P = 0.002) and the control condition (-2 ± 1 µm; P < 0.001). Overstimulation of the OFF-pathway, but not the ON-pathway, resulted in a significantly greater choroidal thinning compared with the control condition, both at relaxed (-7 ± 1 µm; P = 0.003) and 5 D (-11 ± 1 µm; P = 0.005) accommodation levels. Similar changes were also observed for macular total, stromal, and luminal ChT. Conclusions: Retinal OFF-pathway stimulation enhanced the choroidal thinning associated with accommodation, thereby providing a potential mechanism that involves accommodation and the retinal OFF-signaling pathway, linking near work and myopia.

Genetic Variants Associated With Human Eye Size Are Distinct From Those Conferring Susceptibility to Myopia.

Purpose: Emmetropization requires coordinated scaling of the major ocular components, corneal curvature and axial length. This coordination is achieved in part through a shared set of genetic variants that regulate eye size. Poorly coordinated scaling of corneal curvature and axial length results in refractive error. We tested the hypothesis that genetic variants regulating eye size in emmetropic eyes are distinct from those conferring susceptibility to refractive error. Methods: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) for corneal curvature in 22,180 adult emmetropic individuals was performed as a proxy for a GWAS for eye size. A polygenic score created using lead GWAS variants was tested for association with corneal curvature and axial length in an independent sample: 437 classified as emmetropic and 637 as ametropic. The genetic correlation between eye size and refractive error was calculated using linkage disequilibrium score regression for approximately 1 million genetic variants. Results: The GWAS for corneal curvature in emmetropes identified 32 independent genetic variants (P < 5.0e-08). A polygenic score created using these 32 genetic markers explained 3.5% (P < 0.001) and 2.0% (P = 0.001) of the variance in corneal curvature and axial length, respectively, in the independent sample of emmetropic individuals but was not predictive of these traits in ametropic individuals. The genetic correlation between eye size and refractive error was close to zero (rg = 0.00; SE = 0.06; P = 0.95). Conclusions: These results support the hypothesis that genetic variants regulating eye size in emmetropic eyes do not overlap with those conferring susceptibility to myopia. This suggests that distinct biological pathways regulate normal eye growth and myopia development.